Publications
Is Moench the End of the Road for Employer ‘Stock Drop’ Claims? The ERISA ‘Stock Drop’ Framework Following the Second Circuit’s Adoption of the Moench Presumption in In re: Citigroup ERISA Litigation
January 9, 2012
Federal courts have seen a large number of so-called ‘‘stock drop’’ cases from employees asserting that defined contribution plan sponsors and fiduciaries are liable for permitting allegedly imprudent investment in company stock. Much of this litigation has focused on the possible application of the ‘‘Moench presumption’’ to defendants’ actions. The presumption heightens the standard for federal courts to apply when reviewing the conduct of ERISA plan sponsors and fiduciaries and makes it easier for stock-drop defendants to get claims against them dismissed.
Related People
Practices
Attachments
Related Insights
Alerts
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) have overhauled Form PF and private fund managers have until March 12, 2025, to begin reporting on the new Form. The changes to the reporting requirements mandated by the amendments to the Form (“Form PF Amendments”) will require substantial preparation by many managers.[1]
Alerts
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) have overhauled Form PF and private fund managers have until March 12, 2025, to begin reporting on the new Form. The changes to the reporting requirements mandated by the amendments to the Form (“Form PF Amendments”) will require substantial preparation by many managers.[1]